350Z hardtop good, convertible bad?

General natter about Datsun/Nissans
Post Reply
Brock365
Posts: 233
Location: Auckland

350Z hardtop good, convertible bad?

Post by Brock365 » Mon Dec 19, 2005 8:07 pm

ANy opinions out there people?
Owner of a Nissan 280ZX, a Toyota WiLL VS (yes its spelt with capital Ls) for the missus and a 2005 Nissan Skyline 3.5 litre manual sedan

User avatar
loose_unit
Posts: 71
Location: Kapiti Coast - Wellington
Contact:

Post by loose_unit » Tue Dec 20, 2005 1:02 am

From what i've seen if you want sporty, hardtop all the way, handles really nicely and is very fun to drive...

the convertable isn't as good and is far more of a cruiser than a driving machine...

me personally i'd take the hard top almost every time... unless i already owned one, then i'd get the soft top as a 2nd one :P
I Currently Don't own a Zed

User avatar
nzeder
Site Admin
Posts: 1503
Location: Auckland
Contact:

Post by nzeder » Wed Dec 21, 2005 8:23 am

I am with you both. Hardtop 8) ragtop = looks like an afterthought hang on it was. This is just a personal thing but I like convertibles that are designed as ragtops from the start not a coupe with some structural changes then hack the roof off.
76 RS30 260z
70 Mini Cooper S (replica)
Previous
73 RS30 260z track
70 HS30-00016 240z
72 HS30 240z 2.8 track
71 HS30 240z 3.2 road/track
79 HS130 280zx
82 HS130 280zx T top
2x 73 KP710 160JSSS
74 KB210 120Y Coupe
71 510 1600 Deluxe

Post Reply